Former Huawei 'Genius Teen' Slams DeepSeek Interview Over Controversy: Dual-Screen Coding Accused of 'Cheating'?

1. The Trigger: A Top Talent Hits a Wall

In late June 2026, to cope with the white-hot competition in the AGI race, DeepSeek announced plans to at least double the size of every department. Impressed by DeepSeek's technical prowess, the highly renowned Li Bojie decided to apply for a frontline R&D role himself.

However, according to a social media post by Li on July 6, the interview experience was nothing short of a "disaster." First, the process was painfully slow—after passing the written test, he heard nothing for half a month until he repeatedly followed up to schedule the interview. Second, during the second round, the interviewer not only showed up late but also made "flippant" remarks about his top-tier research results from Huawei and Microsoft Research Asia, making it clear they were on completely different wavelengths technically.

2. The Core Controversy: Is Using Dual Monitors 'Copying Code'?

What truly ignited the public outcry was the final coding test. As a seasoned geek, Li used a standard developer setup with dual monitors during the interview. But when he frequently glanced at the left screen, the interviewer abruptly stopped him and, without any concrete evidence, interrogated him with a "guilty until proven innocent" tone, asking if he was "copying code."

The interviewer even aggressively demanded that Li "prove his innocence" or the interview would be terminated. This blatant lack of respect and trust made Li feel "seriously offended." He flatly refused to defend himself, unilaterally ended the interview on the spot, and then made the whole story public.

3. Industry Reflection: The Growing Pains of Hyper-Scaling

The incident sparked explosive discussions on workplace and tech communities like Maimai and Zhihu:

• Rigid Evaluation of Top Talent: Many seasoned tech experts rallied behind Li, pointing out that for a chief scientist-level talent, interviews should focus on architecture design, system implementation, and cutting-edge vision. Using a rigid, boilerplate coding test to humiliate an industry-leading expert is a textbook sign of a broken hiring system.
• Management and Training Gaps: More comments hit the nail on the head, calling this an inevitable "growing pain" for AI unicorns like DeepSeek during hyper-scaling. They have ample funding and leading tech, but their HR systems and interviewer professionalism training lag far behind the company's breakneck growth, leading to this absurd, customer-repelling farce.

4. The Geek Spirit Lives On & The Need for a High-Speed Network

Regardless of how this incident ultimately plays out, Li's outspokenness not only embodies the true geek spirit but also serves as a wake-up call for every AI company racing ahead: Respecting talent isn't just about salary—it's about professional processes and basic human decency.

In the AI era, access to cutting-edge information and top-tier development tools is a non-negotiable need for every geek and tech professional. Whether you're researching frontier models like DeepSeek or freely accessing global open-source communities and large model APIs, a super-fast, stable, low-latency premium international network line is your essential "dual-monitor" infrastructure.

Chief Reviewer

Revan

8 Years Cross-Border Network Ops / Full-Stack Dev

Dedicated to neutral, objective VPN proxy reviews. All test data comes from real-world peak-hour measurements. No paid deletions, only flagship nodes that pass the test.

Review Standards